Re: [PATCH 1/7] Rework strbuf API and semantics.

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

let me thank you for this very nicely done patch series.  Except for 5/7, 
they look pretty much obvious changes to me.  I'll review that in detail 
later.

On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:

quoted

+#define STRBUF_INIT  { 0, 0, 0, NULL }

Would not "struct strbuf sb = { 0 };" have the same effect?  (I am not so 
standards-keen as other people, who I have no doubt will gladly answer 
this one.)

AFAIR, non-specified static memory areas are initialized to zero bits,
and NULL resp (void *)0 is not guaranteed to be represented by zero
bits.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum