Hi,
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, V?in? J?rvel wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 12:55, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, V?in? J?rvel wrote:
quoted
I also think that maintaining a proper .gitignore is imporant, and
more productive than using --only-tracked instead. But when I have
cruft that can't be put in .gitignore, or it would ignore files that
are supposed to be shown and tracked, I use --only-tracked.
Would it not be better to imitate the "-x" and "-X" options of
ls-files, then? You could achieve the effect you desire by "git
status -x \*" then.
I haven't used that option, do I understand correctly, that with that
option, you should provide another exclusion file? That would remove the
dynamic ability of --only-tracked.
-X takes a filename, -x a pattern.
Hth,
Dscho