Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: merge-recursive: do not rudely die on binary merge

From: Chris Shoemaker <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:29

On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 05:09:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Chris Shoemaker [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
This changes merge-recursive to still warn but do the "binary"
merge for such a path; leave the "our" version in the working
tree, but still keep the path unmerged so that the user can sort
it out.
Very nice.
Forgot to ask.  I did this because you had trouble on #git
yesterday and then at around the same time today somebody else
had the same issue.  Did this patch solve your problem?  I do
not think this has big risk of regression, but if it does not
help anything there is no reason to put it in 1.5.3, so I am
asking for a success report.
Yes, with this patch, the merge completes, and leaves the index and
working tree in a sane state.  Thanks again.

-chris
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help