Re: [PATCH] Allow git-svnimport to take "" as the trunk directory.
From: Leandro Lucarella <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:29
David Kastrup, el 14 de agosto a las 07:45 me escribiste:
Alberto Bertogli [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Some repositories started with the trunk in "/" and then moved it to the standard "trunk/" location. On these repositories, the correct thing would be to call git-svnimport -T "",I would not call that the best solution: it makes the bad decision from the past impact useful work in the future. I very much like git having a good toplevel directory structure.
Besides the example of a mutating trunk directory, I have repositories where there is only trunk (in "/" directory) and it never changes. Without this patch, I can't even import that kind of repositories. With repositories with a mutating trunk directory, I used the options -s and -l to incrementally import the repository. For example: $ git svnimport -l 100 -T '' <repo> and then $ git svnimport -s 101 -T 'trunk' <repo>
There are two approaches possible: one is to version the mapping trunk/tags/branches. Another would be if one could tell git-svn where to stick stuff that does not sort into trunk/tags/branches. Incidentally, I've seen repositories that have something like a "support" or "vendor" directory, too.
The patch is for git-svnimport, not git-svn (but maybe git-svn has the same problem). Anyways, a way to map trunk/tags/branches to different directories in different versions would be great, but is a different problem than -T not supporting an empty string. -- Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/ .------------------------------------------------------------------------, \ GPG: 5F5A8D05 // F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05 / '--------------------------------------------------------------------' Como un rinoceronte que lleva un pájaro en el lomo, yo te alimento, no te veo ni te toco.