Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Makes me wonder why it is not like:
$ git update-index --refresh Documentation/
That is:
- why a new option?
It was to avoid breaking backwards compatibility, since passing files
with --refresh currently has a different meaning. But if you think we
can change that, then sure, it would be much nicer.
- why not a pathspec or glob, similar to what ls-files gets?
I'm not sure, would this really belong in update-index since it
currently always requires explicit pathnames? Or should it be in a
higher-level command like git-add --refresh?
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org