Alexandre Julliard [off-list ref] writes:
This allows to quickly refresh a file that has been touched without
having to stat all the files of the project.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <redacted>
---
Does this look reasonable? The refresh_index_path() function is a
copy/paste of refresh_index(), I'm not sure all of it is really
needed, but I don't claim to understand all the subtleties of the
index management...
Makes me wonder why it is not like:
$ git update-index --refresh Documentation/
That is:
- why a new option?
- why not a pathspec or glob, similar to what ls-files gets?