On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Matthew L Foster wrote:
quoted
but if git did what you wanted it would show every commit with the time of
the merge, and that wouldn't help you anyway.
Actually that is exactly what I want. I want to know what local time change X and Y (and all
changes) were merged locally.
You misunderstand. It would do so both for the newly merged commits *and*
for the old commits. Because _you_ think the "new" commits got merged, but
it's logically exactly equivalent to saying that the *old* commits got
merged.
So now *every* single commit would get the timestamp of the merge.
See? It would be pointless.
Linus