Steven Grimm [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
No, I am way more cunning and lazy than that. I did not have
hunch about the common case, so I just had you (and anybody else
who would join the thread) do necessary thinking and guessing
for me ;-)
Ah, good. So it sounds like what I've got is at least an okay first
cut from a functionality point of view. Dscho (or anyone else), any
objections to the code in v2 of my patch? I believe I addressed all
the feedback from v1.
I have already queued it for 1.5.3-rc3. Thanks.