Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?

On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote:

Try this, let me know what you think.  I called the changes in the
working directory "Local uncommitted changes, not checked in to index"
and the changes in the index "Local changes checked in to index but
not committed".

ACK.

This matches exactly what I was thinking of.

The red vs magenta looks a bit too close in color for me (red, green and 
blue?), but quite frankly, it's not like I really care.

Those author/date fields look really empty, but that's probably a good way 
to emphasize that they aren't real commits, so while it's visually a bit 
strange, it probably is the right thing to do.

		Linus