Re: [PATCH] Per-path attribute based hunk header selection.

On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

About the comment from Johannes regarding hunk_header vs
funcname, I would actually prefer hunk_header, since that is
what this is about ("funcname" and "find_func" were misnomer
from the beginning), but I'd rename hunk_header to funcname for
the sake of consistency and minimizing the diff.

I think "minimizing the diff" in this case is a bad reason.  Using 
hunk_header is so much better than funcname IMHO.


Nicolas