Re: Update local tracking refs when pushing- no way to disable
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:20
Hi, On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:quoted
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote:quoted
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:quoted
Related, but not identical, is the problem illustrated in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/49888 IMHO there is a bug. IIUC git push first looks for common ref names on the local and remote side (yes, refs/remotes are excluded since v1.5.3-rc0~9, but the underlying problem is still there). Then it pushes them. But here, something seems to have gone wrong: refs/remotes/origin/HEAD is a symref. And the corresponding ref is updated. Should git-push not just _not_ update symrefs?I believe this actually have nothing to do with git-push; it's actually git-receive-pack and maybe git-send-pack. Probably git-receive-pack shouldn't list symrefs at all, or should somehow report them as links so that they can be compared as links. The only refs that git-push itself updates are tracking refs on the local side for refs on the remote side which were updated. In the report, the reporter had (obviously) not configured any local tracking refs for the remote's tracking refs.Sorry, I think I did not make myself clear. The updates refs were _local_ refs. And they _were_ symrefs.No, no local refs were updated. This would have given the message "Also local refs/remotes/origin/HEAD", which wasn't there. What was updated was tracking refs on the remote (which were created as local tracking refs when somebody was running git commands local to the repository which, for the failing command, was remote). The logic for updating local refs on a push was not used at all in this case, according to the output in the message you linked to.
Okay, I misunderstood, then. Sorry for the noise, Dscho