Re: [PATCH] Document git-stash

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

+(no subcommand)::
+
+	Save your local modifications to a new 'stash', and run `git-reset
+	--hard` to revert them.

For orthogonality's sake, should this be 'git-stash save', aliased to
just 'git-stash'? It would make this heading a little more intuitive,
and the very first paragraph (describing all of the modes) a little more
clear.

I would further suggest that we _require_ 'git stash save' to
create a new one and perhaps make the non-subcommand case run
'git stash list'.  While I was trying the code out I
accidentally created a new stash when I did not mean to, which
pushed the stash I wanted to apply down in the list every time I
made such a mistake.