On 6/25/07, Dan Chokola [off-list ref] wrote:
So, relating back to the original post, and extending on Linus'
'academic' analogy, Darcs is like a thesis project from university
that proves how DSCM can be done scientifically. Git is grown-up Darcs
that proves how DSCM can be done practically.
I don't think it's like that. More like
- BK showed it's done
- Darcs picked some good bits from BK (while no other foss dscm did
until git/hg/bzr came along) but got distracted with interesting but
not-that-useful stuff - see patch algebra.
cheers,
m