Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: Darcs · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Darcs · Dan Chokola <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Darcs · Martin Langhoff <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: Darcs

From: Martin Langhoff <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:18

On 6/25/07, Dan Chokola [off-list ref] wrote:
So, relating back to the original post, and extending on Linus'
'academic' analogy, Darcs is like a thesis project from university
that proves how DSCM can be done scientifically. Git is grown-up Darcs
that proves how DSCM can be done practically.
I don't think it's like that. More like

 - BK showed it's done
 - Darcs picked some good bits from BK (while no other foss dscm did
until git/hg/bzr came along) but got distracted with interesting but
not-that-useful stuff - see patch algebra.

cheers,


m
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help