On 09/06/07, Yann Dirson [off-list ref] wrote:
Speaking of transactions, did you have a chance to read the proposal I
posted some time ago ? As stated in another mail, I fear that
approach does generalize easily to core git - but for lack of a better
solution, we may want to go this way anyway...
Yes, I managed to read most of it at that time. I'll try to reply to
the individual points in that e-mail. My idea was to store all the
stack state, including patch information, in a single file rather than
having them scattered around (maybe XML, sounds cool :-) but it's not
easily parseable from shell-scripts).
--
Catalin