Re: [PATCH 3/3] builtin-add: simplify (and increase accuracy of) exclude handling
From: Jonas Fonseca <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:15
Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote Mon, Jun 11, 2007:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 05:01:23PM +0200, Jonas Fonseca wrote:quoted
I think you could even get rid of has_ignored with something like this.Nope, I had originally wanted to do that, but the dir_struct.ignored list contains _all_ ignored items, not just those that were originally in the pathspec. The prune_ignored call sets uninteresting ones to NULL. That function could compact the list and re-set ignored_nr, but it doesn't currently do so.
Ah, I see.
An even more elegant solution would be for read_directory to mark whether an ignored file comes from a pathspec, or was found through recursion. That would be more efficient, and it would remove the prune_ignored thing, which is IMHO a little hack-ish. I don't have time to work on it now, but I might look at it more tonight or tomorrow (but please, if you are interested, take a crack at it).
Yes, I think it might be nice for me to do if you don't mind. I would like some more experience with the git code. Maybe even redo the whole patch series to also fix the concerns about the alloc_grow macro. -- Jonas Fonseca