Hi,
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Johan Herland wrote:
The text-based softrefs file format uses 82 bytes per entry (40 bytes
from_sha1 in hex, 1 byte SP, 40 bytes to_sha1 in hex, 1 byte LF).
The binary softrefs file format uses 40 bytes per entry (20 bytes
from_sha1, 20 bytes to_sha1).
Moving to a binary format increases performance slightly, but sacrifices
easy readability of the softrefs files.
It is bad style to introduce one type, and then change it to another in a
backwards-incompatible way. Either you make it backwards compatible, or
you start with the second format, never even mentioning that you had
another format.
Ciao,
Dscho