Re: [RFC] git integrated bugtracking
From: Yann Dirson <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:13
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 05:19:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Another think that notes do not address are another operation we usually do on bugs: merge (or duplicates). There is a think I hate in bugzilla and love in debbugs, it's that duplicate bugs are closed in the former, and merged in the latter. When two bugs are the same, their history are often *both* valuable, and you really don't want to lose one half, you want to merge them. And you also want the option to "unmerge" them, but for that the better option is to have the ability to duplicate a bug (aka debbugs cloning).
I can't wait for visualising the history of bugreports in gitk, along with duplicates/forks and merges :)
Anyways it's just gossip, but maybe someone will have a brilliant ideas, so I'm just throwing my thoughts into this mail :)
/me wishes all gossip would be as productive as this one :) Best regards, -- Yann