Junio C Hamano wrote:
If you were doing an efficient cgi script that renders history
of git managed projects, binding git as its subproject, and that
system can be built with either 'maint' (i.e. 1.5.2 series) or
'master' (i.e. ultrastable WIP towards 1.5.3), even though they
both might come from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/,
I think they should be registered as two separate logical
subprojects.
I agree strongly with this, and it's another good reason that we have to
be able to use something other than the URL as the key to look up a
subproject's repository location. If you use the URL it is impossible to
differentiate the two subprojects in this case.
-Steve