Re: [RFC] Fourth round of support for cloning submodules

Hi,

On Thu, 24 May 2007, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:

On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 02:52:25PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

quoted

It is not that expensive to just give the SHA-1 with the URL, and to 
introduce a new namespace, say

3f... submodule/path^{URL:blablub}

to say that the submodule which is connected in "HEAD:path" is available 
with the URL "blablub" and just so happens to be at commit "3f..." at the 
moment. Heck, you can even use this instead of expensive fetches to verify 
up-to-date, and even more, you can make sure that you are as up-to-date as 
the remote supermodule.

What about all the other branches?
Also, the submodule may not even be in any of the tips of the branches.

Okay, bad idea.

quoted

Without some very intrusive surgery into the transport code of Git, in 22 
patches, which I am not at all comfortable with.

You're not comfortable with the number or with the patches?
There's only about four or five that deal with this git-config stuff
and any other mechanism would have to implemented as well.

If it was even only one, which is as intrusive, I would still be 
uncomfortable. And yes, the large number does not make me want to review 
the series either.

Ciao,
Dscho