On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:24:04PM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote:
hoi :)
what really is the motivation to suppress submodule checkout at this
level? I can see that we need some per-submodule option for checkout,
but this should influence the actual checkout process and not
read-tree.
It's only used with update is set.
At least we really want to always update the index correctly and a
read-tree --no-submodules which updates the index for submodules but
doesn't go into existing submodules just feels wrong.
It doesn't do that.
skimo