Thread (27 messages) flat view 27 messages, 10 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Smart fetch via HTTP?

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:10

Hi,

On Thu, 17 May 2007, Jan Hudec wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:41:37 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted
And if you have 1) the permission and 2) the CPU power to execute such 
a cgi on the server and obviously 3) the knowledge to set it up 
properly, then why aren't you running the Git daemon in the first 
place?  After all, they both boil down to running git-pack-objects and 
sending out the result.  I don't think such a solution really buys 
much.
Yes, it does. I had 2 accounts where I could run CGI, but not separate 
server, at university while I studied and now I can get the same on 
friend's server. Neither of them would probably be ok for serving larger 
busy git repository, but something smaller accessed by several people is 
OK. I think this is quite common for university students.
1) This has nothing to do with the way the repo is served, but how much 
you advertise it. The load will not be lower, just because you use a CGI 
script.

2) you say yourself that git-daemon would have less impact on the load:
quoted
[...]

Et voilà.  Oh, and of course update your local refs from the 
remote's.

Actually there is nothing really complex in the above operations. And 
with this the server side remains really simple with no special setup 
nor extra load beyond the simple serving of file content.
On the other hand the amount of data transfered is larger, than with the 
git server approach, because at least the indices have to be transfered 
in entirety.
Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help