Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remotes library, take 4

On Sat, 12 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Daniel Barkalow [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Updated for recent review. If remote section name starts with '/', it is 
ignored (like in 1.5.0). If a remote section option has no value, it is 
also ignored (so it doesn't crash, and to be forward-compatible if we 
introduce a boolean option later).

The struct refspec field and associated variables are spelled "dst".

Part 3 is unchanged.

It cannot be left unchanged as it is affected by the dest stuff.

I'll push out a fixed-up one on 'pu' soonish.  Let's stabilize
this a bit without too many resends.

Yeah, I think we agree on how it should be now, and I'm just confusing 
myself regenerating patches. Although, possibly, the comment about NULL 
value should go into documentation for config_fn_t instead, since it's of 
more general applicability than just this.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*