Thread (35 messages) flat view 35 messages, 14 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Merging commits together into a super-commit

From: Karl Hasselström <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:09

On 2007-05-12 16:41:45 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Karl Hasselström wrote:
quoted
What we should do is delete all stgit metadata when the last patch
goes away.
This supposes there is no valuable branch-level metadata. Currently
we have the description - something which could arguably be moved to
the git level as well. Otherwise that sounds reasonable to me.
I left the branch description out of the discussion on purpose, since
it's not that interesting -- if there is a description, we can simply
delete everything except that. And I wholeheartedly agree that the
branch description doesn't belong in stgit; it's orthogonal to the
business of managing a patch stack.
quoted
And we shouldn't have "stg init", either. Initing should be done
automatically when needed.
Good idea as well, that would make stg more accessible to the
average plain-git user.
Yes, that's my secret evil master plan.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help