On Thu, 10 May 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
So while I'm not convinced of the value of consistency here, if we have
to have consistency, I'd rather standardize on config-file-editing.
Why not simply providing both?
You can modify your config with the following commands:
...
Alternatively, you might edit your ~/.gitconfig directly as
well with the following content:
...
Wouldn't that be clearer? This way there is no confusion since it is
clear up front that both methods are equivalent, and the user can choose
between them.
For one, I prefer the git-config method even if I do edit source files
all day long. It just seems faster to me.
Nicolas