On Tue, 1 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
I was not sure if that is even a good idea, and I am now
inclined to think that keeping the failed attempt history is
probably better than potentially causing confusion to people who
follow 'next'. But it _is_ a possibility to reset 'next' to
'master'.
And what is the advantage of doing that, exactly?
Not much and that is why I am not sure if that is a good idea,
but one thing is:
$ git log master..next
$ git log --no-merges master..next
would start showing what are still pending in next without
noise.
If you do so, then please tag the branch before resetting it. I think
it contains valuable data that would get lost otherwise.
Nicolas