Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument

On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:42:39PM +0200, Marcin Kasperski wrote:

quoted

quoted

I agree that git introduces plenty of excellent concepts. What it needs
is better docs (also, clearly known **SINGLE** master doc, just sth like
subversion book),

Does that mean you are volunteering?

No, as I do not have necessary knowledge. But I can volunteer to review
one.

That would be great--see Documentation/user-manual.txt.  (Or
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html.)

Patches welcomed, but so is general review.  It's not my highest
priority, unfortunately, so I may be a little slow to address comments,
but I'll get to them eventually.

I don't expect it to ever be a *single* master doc--I still want to
leave a lot of the details to the man pages, for example, and I expect
there'll always be a need for some shortcut howto's and tutorials.   I
suppose we could include much of that into appendices some day if it
helped findability.

--b.