Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add keyword unexpansion support to convert.c
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:05
Hi, On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Robin H. Johnson" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
As for a usage case: - J.PEBKAC.User gets a a tree (from a tarball or GIT, we should gain the same output) - Copies some file outside of the tree (the user is NOT smart enough, and resists all reasonable attempts at edumacation) - Modifies said file outside of tree. - Contacts maintainer with entire changed file. - User vanishes off the internet. The entire file he sent if it's CVS, contains a $Header$ that uniquely identifies the file (path and revision), and the maintainer can simply drop the file in, and 'cvs diff -r$OLDREV $FILE'. If it's git, the maintainer drops the file in, and does 'git diff $OLDSHA1 $FILE'.I personally hope that the maintainer drops such a non-patch that originates from a PEBKAC.
Me, too. Although people really believe strange things. When I asked such a guy on another list, if he could send me a patch instead of a complete file, he shouted loudly at me that patches were obsolete. Yes. Really. I begged to differ, but I guess he still believes that. Ciao, Dscho