Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [BUG] git-new-workdir doesn't understand packed refs

From: Julian Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:05

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Peter Baumann wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:55:17PM +0100, Julian Phillips wrote:
quoted
 On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Peter Baumann wrote:
quoted
running git-gc or git-gc --prune isn't save because e.g. all the tags
are packed and .git/packed-refs isn't shared on the several workdirs.
 Do you mean that the link wasn't created?  Or that the link was removed and
 replaced with a file when you ran gc from a workdir?
The problem is, when I created the new workdir, I don't have a file
.git/packed-refs, so a new workdir was created with a dangling symlink,
e.g.  workdir/.git/packed-refs -> repo/.git/packed-refs (but the last one
doesn't exist). As it seems, git gc removes the dangling symlink and
replaces it with a file.

Steps to reproduce (written in this mail; after /usr/bin/script gave me an
output whith color coded text *GRR* in ASCII squences):

	mkdir a && cd a && git init
	echo 1 > file.txt
	git add file.txt
	git commit -m "file added"
	git tag v0
	cd ..

	git-new-workdir a b
	cd b && git-gc


Oh. Wait. Just forget that theorie about dangling symlink. git-gc replaces
the symlink in a new workdir with a file. Just confirmed that.

So it isn't save to run git-gc in a workdir.
True.  I don't think that it would be a good idea to run any purely 
repository type commands in a workdir.

-- 
Julian

  ---
You know you're using the computer too much when:
you call a doctor a "virus scanner"
 	-- Lews_Therin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help