Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] refs.c: add a function to sort a ref list, rather then sorting on add

From: Julian Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:05

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Julian Phillips wrote:
quoted
Rather than sorting the refs list while building it, sort in one go
after it is built using a merge sort.  This has a large performance
boost with large numbers of refs.

Signed-off-by: Julian Phillips <redacted>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Looks fine. I think that even your new times are a bit high (over two
seconds?) but things are clearly better. Have you looked at what takes so
long now?
It's the tag auto-following code, I'm calling read_ref to see if I already 
have that tag - and it appears that doing that a few thousand times takes 
a while.

If I comment out that one line (so the code will _always_ think I have 
the tags - but I do have them, so ...) I get:

real    0m0.472s
user    0m0.277s
sys     0m0.181s

Looks like read_ref is the wrong thing to be using ...

-- 
Julian

  ---
"Life is like a buffet; it's not good but there's plenty of it."
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help