Re: [PATCH] display shortlog after git-commit

Quoting Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] display shortlog after git-commit

"Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

Quoting Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] display shortlog after git-commit

"Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Display the subject of the commit just made.

WHY?  You just made the commit.

BTW, Junio, why does git-commit need to display the diffstat?
You just made the commit ...

Don't ask me.  It was not my idea.

We only had --summary per popular list request, and it made
certain amount of sense since addition/deletion are notable
events that do not happen with _every_ commit.

Hmm. I agree. Does it make sense to only show additions/deletions?

Digging through git-commit.sh history, I found this: the log actually
misleadingly talks about the summary of created/deleted files.  Is it possible
that git-runstatus --shortlog reported just the created/deleted files
originally?

commit ebd124c6783da5e064963611ee17741cd173f6b5
Author: Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref]
Date:   Thu Dec 14 23:15:44 2006 -0500

    make commit message a little more consistent and conforting

    It is nicer to let the user know when a commit succeeded all the time,
    not only the first time.  Also the commit sha1 is much more useful than
    the tree sha1 in this case.

    This patch also introduces a -q switch to supress this message as well
    as the summary of created/deleted files.

    Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref]
    Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]

If yes, then is it possible that this change might have been introduced
inadvetently by git-runstatus behaviour change?

Nicolas, what was the intent?

-- 
MST