Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] update-hook: remove all functionality that should be in hooks/post-receive

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:01

Andy Parkins [off-list ref] writes:
Now that we have a post-receive hook; the update hook's only job is to
decide is a particular update is allowed or not.

This example hook removes all of the functionality that should now
rightly be done by the post-receive hook.  In particular: the generation
of notification emails.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <redacted>
I was quite impressed by seeing what Shawn did with his
'continuous' stuff, not the way it is implemented, but the way
it was presented as "you can do this to use it from your hook
script".

You know what?  I am very tempted to take this patch, while
dropping the other one.  Well, dropping is probably not quite
accurate, because being a nice person (and I am good looking,
too ;-), I would probably end up creating "contrib/mailhook/"
hierarchy and stash the contents of your second patch there
myself.

I think I'd better let fancier hooks live in contrib/examples
hierarchy for people to pick and choose, and keep the default
templates/ directory lean and clean.

There is a small detail of how users who use prepackaged git
would get rich library of example hooks from, but that is
something better left to distro people; that way I do not have
to worry about them too much, and it would also make it crystal
clear that these are just examples.

The thing is, not many people are interested in sending e-mail
out from post- any hooks (I don't do so, Linus doesn't either),
and there is no strong justifiation to give e-mail sending users
any preferential treatment and penalize others by copying rather
huge hook scripts from templates/ that they are not going to
ever use.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help