On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Martin Waitz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:01:44AM -0500, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
quoted
Its very likely this did fit in just under 4 GiB of packed data,
but as you said, without O_LARGEFILE we can't work with it.
but newer git version can cope with it:
-r--r--r-- 1 martin martin 3847536413 18. Feb 10:36 pack-ffe867679d673ea5fbfa598b28aca1e58528b8cd.pack
Are you sure you're not just running a 64-bit process?
64-bit processes don't need O_LARGEFILE to process files larger than 2GB,
since for them, off_t is already 64-bit.
Grepping for O_LARGEFILE shows nothing.
Oh, except we have that
#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
which is just a horrible hack. That's nasty. We should just use
O_LARGEFILE rather than depend on some internal glibc thing that works
nowhere else.
Linus