Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] revision walker: Fix --boundary when limited

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:58

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi,

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
	On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

	> "Santi Béjar" [off-list ref] writes:
	> 
	> > the --topo-order does not play well with --boundary and 
	> > --max-count.
	> >
	> > $ git-rev-list --boundary --max-count=50 5ced0 | wc -l
	> > 56
	> > $ git-rev-list --topo-order --boundary --max-count=50 5ced0 \
	> >   | wc -l
	> > 8846
	> >
	> > (5ced0 is git.git's master). I think it should be 56 for both. 
Side note: with the patch I am replying to, the latter command returns 51. 
This is correct, since the only boundary commit it shows (1db8b60b) has 
(all) the other 5 commits as ancestors.

The behaviour of both is correct: in the former case, there is not enough 
information to tell that one of the 6 boundary commits reaches all the 
others.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help