Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
We could introduce a new option "--inline" that does what the
current "--attach" does, and make "--attach" write "attachment;"
instead of "inline;" there, but that changes the behaviour, and
people who are used to use "--attach" to send out patches to
mailing lists suddenly start sending more cumbersome-to-read
variant, so...
... so we should introduce an option "--no-inline"!
Yes, but this time around I _think_ we should admit that the
current option is misnamed and make it right.