Re: Updated version, was Re: RFC: Patch editing

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

My plans are _not_ to turn this into git-rebase--interactive.sh, as I 
originally planned. Instead, I will try to make git-rebase a builtin, and 
add a "-i" flag which does the equivalent of this script.

BTW would people be mad at me if I did _not_ imitate git-rebase.sh (call 
format-patch and feed that into apply), but rather used cherry-pick 
throughout?

Then that C built-in would not replace git-rebase but only
"git-rebase -m".

I very often find it easier to deal with a conflicting rebase by
editing the patch text, so yes I would imagine I would be rather
upset, but I do not know about others.