Re: newbie questions about git design and features (some wrt hg)

On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Brendan Cully wrote:

On Friday, 02 February 2007 at 08:42, Linus Torvalds wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:

quoted

Gaaah. Why anyone would want to have non-propagated tags?

That's *definitely* not the mistake.

I use private tags (and branches, for that matter) all the time. I'd be 
very upset indeed if all my tags were always pushed out when I push 
something out.

The mistake seems to be to think that tags get "versioned", and are part 
of the tree history. That's insane. It means that you can never have a tag 
to a newer tree than the one you are on.

The tags you use can simply be those from the tip of the repository,
regardless of which revision you've currently checked out.

Did you not understand the problem?

If I want to push out my history, that does NOT mean that I don't want to 
push out my tags. At least not to the public sites. I migth want to push 
them out to my other *private* copies, though.

In other words, tags are just like branches. You don't tie two tags 
together, because one may (and does) make sense without the other.

Tying tags into history is silly. They're not "part of" history. They are 
pointers *to* history. And trying to make them part of history has all 
these obvious problems.

			Linus