Re: [PATCH 3/3] prevent HEAD reflog to be interpreted as current branch reflog
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:52
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · [PATCH 3/3] prevent HEAD reflog to be interpreted as current branch reflog · Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] prevent HEAD reflog to be interpreted as current branch reflog · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] prevent HEAD reflog to be interpreted as current branch reflog · Andy Parkins <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] prevent HEAD reflog to be interpreted as current branch reflog · Rogan Dawes <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] prevent HEAD reflog to be interpreted as current branch reflog · Andy Parkins <hidden>
Hi, On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Perhaps we should use @{...} to refer to reflog for HEAD, or use yet
another special notation?
No.
IMHO "bla@{yesterday}" should give you what "bla" pointed to, yesterday.
In that sense, the proposed reflog on "HEAD" makes perfect sense.
I am not quite sure what I need most, the reflog for "HEAD", or that for
my current branch. I guess it is the latter, so I am okay that
"@{yesterday}" should mean the current branch, yesterday.
Ciao,
Dscho