Re: [PATCH 2/4] merge-one-file: use 'wc' more portably

Hi,

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Some wc prefix the number by a tab. Be prepared for this.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
---
 git-merge-one-file.sh |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/git-merge-one-file.sh b/git-merge-one-file.sh
index 7d62d79..bc7c5ef 100755
--- a/git-merge-one-file.sh
+++ b/git-merge-one-file.sh

@@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ case "${1:-.}${2:-.}${3:-.}" in
 		# This extracts OUR file in $orig, and uses git-apply to
 		# remove lines that are unique to ours.
 		orig=`git-unpack-file $2`
-		sz0=`wc -c <"$orig"`
+		sz0=`wc -c <"$orig" | tr -dc 0-9`
 		diff -u -La/$orig -Lb/$orig $orig $src2 | git-apply --no-add 
-		sz1=`wc -c <"$orig"`
+		sz1=`wc -c <"$orig" | tr -dc 0-9`
 
 		# If we do not have enough common material, it is not
 		# worth trying two-file merge using common subsections.

I would prefer losing dq around the $sz0 and $sz1 where they are
used, instead of spawning tr here, and also tighten error
checking by stringing these command sequence with && followed by
a || exit.

I only needed a quick fix to make it work on my machine. The fact that it 
was broken for so long, unnoticed by me, shows that this code path was 
rarely -- if at all -- used.

But since I want it builtin, I don't want to spend time on the script...

Ciao,
Dscho