Re: git-am and git-rebase inconsistency

David Kågedal [off-list ref] writes:

The git-am and git-rebase commands have some similarities in that both
try to apply patches and may fail in the middle.  Both commands can be
rerun to continue the application.  The --skip option is used in both
to skip one patch, but when a conflict has been resolved, git-rebase
uses --continue, and git-am uses --resolved for what seems to me to be
the equivalent action.

It would probably be good, although not terribly important, if these
commands were change to be in harmony.  But I'm not sure which option
I like best...

Well, git-rebase did not have any options like them in the
beginning, so a logical option would be to add --resolved as a
synonym to the latter.