Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: do not report the resulting tree object name

Hi,

On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:

Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

I do not think we need to show 1..15 at all, perhaps without
"export GIT_MERGE_BASE_DEBUG=YesPlease".

Or a -v/--verbose (or even -v -v -v) flag set.

... and you'd pass them from git-pull to git-merge to git-merge-recursive? 
Three different programs parse the same option? And worse, the other 
strategies ignore the setting? What about strategies people implemented 
on _their_ side, which do not know about the "-v" flag? I don't think so.

Ciao,
Dscho