Re: Default "tar" umask..

René Scharfe [off-list ref] writes:

[Junio: Sorry for resending, I somehow dropped the CC:'s the first time.]

I think that was my fault.  I somehow dropped the CC:'s and
resent without you to the list, and you responded to the first
one.

...  Err, unless the target system has a group named git, which
would then be used instead.  Come to think of it, having this "git"
group name in there is a bit strange and unnecessary.  How about the
following patch?

It is a very good point.  I think this patch is sane, regardless
of 002 vs 022 issue.