Hi,
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Raimund Bauer wrote:
* Johannes Schindelin wrote, On 30.12.2006 12:22:
quoted
(Of course, the correct thing would not be "git reset --hard", but rather
"git diff --ours | git apply -R; git reset", but that's a tad long, no?)
Then maybe introduce "git reset --ours" which does exactly that?
That is possible.
But does it make sense?
It is a volatile state, and errors are too easy. So I think it makes sense
to have to _ask_ for such a state.
(Having said that, I think that it actually might make sense for bisecting
an error where you _need_ a local patch to get it running to begin with.)
Ciao,
Dscho