Re: VCS comparison table

On 10/21/06, Sean [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:35:18 +0200
"Erik Bågfors" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

So... I do agree that revnos might not fit perfectly in at all times.
But that they automatically mean that bzr is not a decentralized VCS,
I strongly disagree with.  They are just one part of the equation.

Whoe are you strongly disagreeing with?  Nobody said it wasn't a
decentralized VCS.  But there is a _clear_ bias towards using it
with a central server.

Ok, I take that back :)

When I think "centralized" I think "everyone must commit to a central
repository"... which is not what we are talking about here...

/Erik
ps. Sean, your mailer does something wierd with my last name in the
to-field, so I can't just hit "reply" without removing my name
first...

/Erik

-- 
google talk/jabber. zindar@gmail.com
SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@gizmoproject.com
sip:17476714687@proxy01.sipphone.com