Re: [PATCH] git-pickaxe: blame rewritten.

Dear diary, on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:55:49PM CEST, I got a letter
where Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] said that...

Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Currently it does what git-blame does, but only faster.

More importantly, its internal structure is designed to support
content movement (aka cut-and-paste) more easily by allowing
more than one paths to be taken from the same commit.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <redacted>
---

I really hate to do this immediately after writing obituary for
annotate, but I had a solid 24-hour to work on git, which is a
rare opportunity for me these days, so here it is.

Why not reuse git-annotate name? git-pickaxe doesn't do pickaxe...

I agree that git-pickaxe is wrong, and luckily Junio does too,
apparently.

But please, let's not go right back to the git-annotate / git-blame
situation. It's just confusing to have two tools that do the same thing,
perhaps subtly differently. If it's gonna replace git-blame, it should
either do that right away or live as git-blame2 for some time, but not
play any confusing games with the names.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)