Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Is there a problem with taking [ref]?
I think it's currently not worth the complexity and breakage of
backwards compatibility to do the more elaborate form you proposed.
I agree with that, except that the 72x27 dimension bit troubles
me.
First, that's the problem for the future. The 72x27 was there, I have not
introduced this.
That's exactly my point. This is not a "placing blame" game.
It just feels wrong to update only two things when we already
know there are others that need fixing in a very similar way.