Re: What will happen to git.git in the near future

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
[...]

I think that this could be done very efficiently (both in terms of time 
and size) as a "pure" builtin, i.e. something with works as
"git tar-tree", but not as "git-tar-tree". Of course, this would break 
scripts using the latter instead of the former. Just my 2 yinyangs.

That would be a bug. If "git foo" works, then "git-foo" should also work.