Thread (19 messages) flat view 19 messages, 9 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Marking abandoned branches

From: Jon Smirl <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:40

On 9/13/06, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Jon Smirl wrote:
quoted
Moving the refs into refs/abandoned would work too. We would need new
git commands to do this and flags on the visualization tools to
include the abandoned branches. On the other hand doing this is
recording state about the repository in the refs directory instead of
writing this state into the repo itself.
Well, the refs directory is _part_ of the repository. Think about it, if
you do not know which branches are in the object database, you lack a lot
of information.
If you delete all of your heads you can recover them by following all
of the chains in the repo to find them. Doing this would recover the
abandoned branches too but it would mix them up with the active heads.
This is not a big deal but it is info that is getting stored outside
of the object db.

-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help