Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Jakub Narebski wrote:
quoted
index 199fbe87384cd3f4686916277dd124cefc751e8a..f3b762de92e579300eba3f53ee26b2a80b4e76c7 100644
Hmmm... I do wonder why --binary implies --full-index option.
Patch safety. Yours happened to be a creation patch so it might
not matter in this particular case, but we would want to be
reasonably sure there is no ambiguity in the preimage when you
are doing a modification patch.
Couldn't we do this (show full sha1) only for the binary part of patch?
Personally I would say why bother, but patches welcome if
cleanly done.