Re: Perl gurus: why do we need Scalar::Util?
From: Randal L. Schwartz <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:33
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Johannes" == Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
Johannes> please do not let my die dumb: what is this "blessed" thing all about? And
Johannes> why do we need it in the private-Error.pm??
Ugh. Just took a peek for the first time at the "next" branch, and I see the
dangerous syntactic-sugar try { } catch { }. Sorry for not noticing that
earlier.
While that syntax looks like it would make things easier in theory, in
practice it is a source of leak-after-leak because it creates a closure for
the two blocks, and that can easily lead to a circular reference for
long-running tools. This would be of some concern if someone writes
a mod_perl module or a standalone webserver that doesn't exec itself
to clean up (which it shouldn't need).
So, if there's going to be rewrite, the first part would be to eliminate
the try { } catch { } sugar, and replace it with more traditional
exception catchers.
eval { };
if ($@) { ... }
Note that I'm *not* suggesting not to use Error.pm - that's a great
means by which to create hierarchical error classes that stringify nicely
and carry context on the error. I'm just saying to throw out the
try/catch syntax helper.
Sorry about that. If it's any consequence, we got it right in Perl 6. :)
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
[off-list ref] <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!