Re: What *have* I done?
From: Nix <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:33
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Petr Baudis yowled:
Hi, Dear diary, on Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 12:48:22AM CEST, I got a letter where Nix [off-list ref] said that...quoted
loki 593 /usr/packages/linux/linux% cg-diff | diffstatNote that cg-diff -s might be useful.
Indeed :)
quoted
loki 594 /usr/packages/linux/linux% cg-reset loki 595 /usr/packages/linux/linux% cg-diff loki 596 /usr/packages/linux/linux%...but when you switch away and switch back, the uncommitted changes appear again?
Yes.
Just in case, don't the tree happen to simply stay the same as in the branch you switched from? (Try cg-diff -r yourpreviousbranch.)
Yes. Also, that branch (which was forked recently from the misbehaving one) claims that all changes are merged from that branch, but this is demonstrably untrue.
And most importantly, does this also happen with just stock 0.17.3 cg-switch? With stock master cg-switch? (If both is no, you probably forgot to cherrypick some associated cg-switch bugfix or something.)
This is 0.17.3 cg-switch plus the seek speedup 40f8a28806a1c5a7cb1f7d137f1bb271b71f890f. (I doubt that's to blame, but I've been wrong before.) I think the oddity is related to git-cherry-pick somehow, but I'm not sure how: I took the original upstream pack again, rebuilt the branches from scratch and now I can't make the problem happen anymore. If it happens again I'll keep the tree around and collect more data. (I'll have to dig some more disk space up...) -- `She *is*, however, one of the few sf authors with a last name ending in O, which adds some extra appeal to those of us who obsess about things like having a book review of an author for each letter in the alphabet.' -- rra